How to Read a File in Coderpad

The Best Code Assessment Platforms for Live Interviews in 2020

[🚨🚨🚨 Read the 2021 updated version of this article here ]

By 2020, remote work was already on an upward trend. Given the widespread sheltering in place due to Covid-xix, virtually all work and communication is at present remote. Information technology'southward more important than always for technical recruiters to have an excellent application stack in place to interview, rent, and onboard developers. With our exclusive hiring data, you tin rails the software development talent market here.

If you're a technical recruiting or engineering hiring manager, here are the latest reviews and comparisons of 2020's top platforms for real-time, 1:one coding interviews with developer candidates. Make sure to also check out our reviews of lawmaking screening platforms.

Across lawmaking assessments for interviews, check out our other reviews:

Top code assessment platforms for screening →

Height code assessment platforms for projects →

1. CoderPad

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Pricing

CoderPad is a pioneer of online IDE's with one of the first and most pop coding interview platforms. They provide a uncomplicated dashboard to runway candidates and start new interviews called "pads". The online IDE they built works well for near languages and information technology tin execute lawmaking fairly apace which makes information technology easy for the candidate to debug their lawmaking as they are writing it.

Pros

• Easy to setup and provides different pricing tiers for all company sizes.
• The online editor works very well for most languages.
• Monthly subscription beginning at $50/calendar month for 20 interviews allows companies to throttle how much they're interviewing from month-to-calendar month.

Cons

• No way to test front-cease skills similar React, Angular, Vue.js, etc.
• No way to exam back-end technologies and frameworks like Node.js/Express, Docker, Django, Reddish on Rails, etc.
• No mode to collaborate with a candidate on more circuitous projects like building a simple Node.js server, debugging a React Native application, etc.

Recommended for:

• Companies that need a simple and affordable tool to interview candidates online. Smashing for savvy engineers who can set upwardly their own interviews from scratch.

2. Coderbyte Interviews

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Capterra Reviews | Pricing

The Coderbyte Interviews product allows you to easily create interview sessions, send them to candidates, and manage all of your sessions on your dashboard. On Coderbyte you're able to invite an unlimited number of candidates on any program so you never have to worry almost striking a limit per month.

Aside from testing algorithmic and basic programming skills, you lot're too able to collaborate with candidates on front end-finish, back-finish, DevOps, and database challenges. You can create your ain challenges with examination cases or load in a claiming from Coderbyte's library straight into the session.

Yous're too able to integrate the sessions with any application via Zapier which can allow you to streamline your entire interview process. For example, when candidates are washed with an interview session you lot can have the results, rating, and interview notes automatically sent to a channel on Slack.

Pros

• Plans begin at $99/month and all plans include unlimited candidates.
• All plans as well include products for code claiming screening and accept-domicile projects so you tin manage your unabridged interview procedure.
• Power to test front end-end, back-end, database, DevOps, and more.
• Coderbyte'due south code editor enables candidates to perform Google searches straight on the page which mimics how actual software engineers write code.

Cons

• Lacks enterprise features like SSO.
• Yous take to phone call candidates separately, equally Coderbyte does non notwithstanding have video or audio back up.

Recommended for:

• Tech recruiters and engineering teams that care securely about the candidate experience and desire maximum flexibility to test a broad multifariousness of skills.

iii. HackerRank CodePair

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Capterra Reviews | Pricing

The CodePair product by HackerRank enables an interviewer and candidate to collaborate in an online environment to solve coding issues together and sketch diagrams. They provide an easy way to share challenge descriptions with a candidate forth with providing them an online IDE to write and execute their lawmaking.

Their online editor supports over 35 languages, tin exist customized by candidates, and comes with built in audio/video capabilities. Their platform also allows recruiters to hands leave feedback about the candidate after the session for the rest of their team to run into later on.

Pros

• Supports 35+ languages and the editor is customizable by candidates.
• Born audio/video capabilities.
• Freehand diagrams.

Cons

• Monthly limit on number of sessions you tin run on most plans and on number of admins you tin have on the account.
• Only supports algorithm challenges and uncomplicated programming problems — you cannot examination front-cease and back-stop technologies, e.thou. React, Python/Django, Blood-red on Track, etc.

Recommended for:

• Large corporations that require enterprise features like SSO, GDPR compliance, and advanced privacy features.

iv. CodeSignal Interview

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Capterra Reviews | Pricing

CodeSignal'south Interview tool is another suitable option for companies looking to streamline their technical interviewing process. Their platform makes it easy to track and create new sessions, and their online editor makes information technology easy to interact and code with candidates.

Similar to HackerRank, their Interview tool also provides the ability to create diagrams and draw freely. Their platform supports over 40 languages and a great part of their tool is that candidates can run test cases that the recruiter setup beforehand.

Pros

• Candidates tin run test cases directly in the editor.
• They provide recordings of the interview sessions.
• Freehand diagrams.

Cons

• Pricing plans are more affordable than HackerRank, but you're still limited in the number of sessions y'all can run per month.
• Only supports algorithm challenges and simple programming issues — you cannot test front-end and back-finish technologies, e.1000. React, Python/Django, Cherry-red on Rails, etc.

Recommended for:

• Recruiters at loftier-growth tech companies with substantial funding and hiring needs.

5. Codility CodeLive

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Capterra Reviews | Pricing

CodeLive enables candidates and recruiters to collaborate online using real-life tasks in a shared development environment. Their tool comes with built-in audio/video capabilities and it also has a whiteboard characteristic chosen Sail which allows users in the session to draw period charts and diagrams.

CodeLive supports over 40 languages and allows candidates to run examination cases confronting their solutions. Information technology too supports templates then interviewers can easily start sessions with predefined tasks and code templates, making the unabridged feel more than efficient.

Pros

• Candidates can create and run their own test cases.
• Built-in audio/video capabilities.
• Templates can be predefined for new sessions.
• Freehand diagram.

Cons

• Pricing is non readily provided but is estimated to begin at around $6,000/yr.
• Just supports algorithm challenges and simple programming issues — cannot test front-end and back-end technologies, eastward.m. React, Python/Django, Ruby on Rails, etc.

Recommended for:

• Like to HackerRank, Codility is better suited for larger companies that crave enterprise features like SSO, GDPR compliance, and avant-garde privacy features.

6. CodeInterview

Helpful links: Website | G2 Reviews | Pricing

CodeInterview is well-nigh similar to CoderPad because of their minimal platform that focuses on making it easy for engineering interviewers to beginning new sessions and collaborate with candidates. Their online editor supports over 25 languages, and it's ane of the only other platforms aside from Coderbyte where you can interview candidates in technologies like Vue.js, React, Angular, Limited, and other front-stop languages.

They have a born audio/video capability, forth with a code playback feature and other enterprise features like SSO and team collaboration.

Pros

• Easy-to-use dashboard with modern editor which provides a good candidate experience.
• They support front-end technologies like React, Vue.js, Athwart, and more.
• Advanced features similar sound/video, code replay, templates, and SSO.

Cons

• They have monthly pricing options, but information technology heavily limits the number of candidates you tin can invite per month.

Recommended for:

• Minor companies with limited hiring needs.

Other popular online editors that can exist used for alive interviews

There are a number of phenomenal high-tech, online IDE'southward that are designed primarily for educational and training purposes. All the same, with plenty fourth dimension, engineers can configure workflows on the two below for live interviewing.

Repl.information technology

Repl.information technology is a free, online collaborative IDE that allows people to code in 50+ languages and technologies together. I of the all-time online IDE'south out in that location today, yous can employ multiplayer mode to collate with multiple people at once to code in any language or even build applications together in React, Angular, Node.js, Python/Flask, and more than.

Recruiters can potentially use this tool for interviewing candidates, but managing the sessions would have to be done manually on their ain since they don't provide a recruiting dashboard for this. The closest thing is the Teams feature they have which allows engineers to create templates and share sessions with each other.

Codesandbox

Codesandbox.io makes web evolution in the browser extremely easy. Information technology is an online IDE that enables developers to create applications in 20+ unlike web technologies and frameworks like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, and more. You're able to share the session link with someone else, which allows for collaboration between recruiters and potential candidates in an interview.

Like with repl.it, managing user sessions and inviting candidates would take to be managed outside of the platform since they don't provide a recruiting dashboard for this.

leeboxistaken.blogspot.com

Source: https://medium.com/coderbyte/the-best-platforms-for-live-coding-interviews-in-2020-19fb3661df84